|
|
Professor Terry Young
Chair of Healthcare
Systems
PROF TERENCE PAUL YOUNG
School
of Information Systems, Computing & Mathematics
Brunel
University
Uxbridge,
Middlesex UB8 3PH
Desk:
018952 66052 Mob: 07786 546633
e-mail:
terry.young@brunel.ac.uk
02
September 2010
I
am a professor with a unique ability to bridge - across disciplines,
cultures and organisations - forged over 8½ years in academia and
16½ years in industry. I enjoy teaching and possess a first class
record of research in science, technology, and Information Systems
- commercially and academically - with strong management and commercial
skills. Since 2001, I have built a portfolio of multi-university
collaborative research in healthcare products and service.
My
aims are to:
|
Extend my healthcare research
portfolio in terms of depth, delivery and policy reach.
|
|
Play a strategic role in melding
research, enterprise and executive education in new ways.
|
|
Combine value-based research with
new business models in healthcare.
|
I
left industry because I believed in the ideas I was working on:
that they could change the way we deliver healthcare. In focusing
on the linkage between services and technology, and between evaluation
and business models, I still believe the goal is reachable with
the right team.
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS
2001
Professor of Healthcare Systems, Brunel University
1999
GEC and the Marconi: Business Development Director - Medical
Systems
1996
Manager, Optoelectronic & Interconnection Division
1989
Won IEE Premium for best paper in an IEE journal (see publication
list, No 27)
1985
Senior Research Scientist, Marconi Research Centre, Chelmsford
EDUCATION & QUALIFICATIONS
ACADEMIC HIGHLIGHTS
Teaching
Although
I have always enjoyed communicating, academic teaching has introduced
me to new concepts and activities: learning outcomes and criterion
based marking, for instance. In terms of the former, I have nearly
managed to work the process properly from the end - setting the
exam early, and reversing through preparation and refinement of
the individual lectures. As to the latter, criterion-based techniques
are now common for essay work and we have just modified the examination
structure of the final year course in project management to apply
criterion-based assessment.
I
am in my fourth year as an external examiner for the Imperial College
Business School and have particularly enjoyed the vivas of the medical
students undertaking a year of business studies.
Research:
My
industrial experience has taught me that there is real scope to
apply team-working methods to great effect. In my mainstream research,
this has resulted in multi-university, multi-disciplinary teams
that have attracted significant levels of funding. My successes
include:
|
Grants
won total around £13.5M, including the following active projects:
|
MATCH
(Phase 1 to 2008) with Birmingham, Nottingham, KCL & Ulster:
£3.6M
|
|
MATCH
(www.match.ac.uk)
to 2013 with Birmingham, Nottingham & Ulster: £6.9M
|
|
MATCH-PLUS (as above): £1.75M
|
|
RIGHT
(www.right.org.uk)
to 2009 with Cambridge, Cardiff, So'ton & Ulster: £1.1M
|
|
|
Other
income from MATCH networks: £660k (industrial) and £580k (NHS-based)
to date
|
This
has enabled me to work with some of the best researchers in the
UK and to build a unique portfolio of interests, covering the delivery
of healthcare from services and systems to technology, and covering
a broad range of economic, technological and social science perspectives.
My
publications include over 70 papers of all sorts (including the
trade press) and 8 patents. The most cited -70+ on Google Scholar
- has also been cited in company white papers and even used for
on-line continuing medical education.
Administration:
I
have always taken a strategic interest in campus life. I chaired
one of 8 working groups when the University re-organised itself,
and have worked at centrel University Level on the Costing and Pricing
Sub-Committee and the Research and Knowledge Transfer Committee
and currently serve on the Committee for Academic Staff Promotions.
ACADEMIC DETAILS
Teaching
Undergraduate:
I
enjoy lecturing on Software Project Management to the entire IS
and CS Final Year cohort. My central concern over the past few years
has been to migrate to a more practically relevant syllabus. A few
years ago, we invited a team from commerce and industry in for a
lunch at which we delivered the course at the rate of a week per
slide - or the 24 week course in 20 minutes. This provided good
feedback: we ditched most of the estimation methods and introduced
Earned Value Analysis. I have also developed material around 'softer'
management methods, adding in Belbin's model of roles, for instance,
and something on customer relations. Last year, the module leader
and I worked on the seminar programme, emerging with a more thematic
programme (which even allowed Graduate Teaching Assistants to develop
content). We have plans to take this further, in time, perhaps,
introducing a business game into the seminar slots. Finally, we
have developed the exam to include a wider range of techniques (including
multiple-choice) and now criteria-based marking. Students report
positively and like the way it is grounded in reality.
I
have supervised and second-marked Final Year Projects (FYPs). Brunel
places a strong emphasis on methodology, which has provided a counterbalance
to my earlier experience in science and engineering, where results
and reasoning were more prominent in the assessment. In 2003, I
proposed and helped to introduce a Remedial Day for FYPs which was
used until the programme was revamped this year. The rationale was
to counter the fact that weaker students who were already struggling,
tended to be given even more work to do, and this modification enabled
those who failed their first phase to recover to a bare pass within
a day and move on.
Masters:
I
have done a small amount of lecturing in e-Health and Telemedicine.
I have also second-read MSc dissertations. One summer, I ran a series
of open seminars for Masters students undertaking healthcare-related
projects. Most recently, I have worked on a syllabus for a transformational
Masters in healthcare leadership that would enable clinicians to
move from clinical practice to board-level roles. The aim was that
it would focus strongly on the 'softer' elements of leadership,
with courses to study specific leaders and immersion in role play
and scenario-based learning. I am just in the process of seeking
an appropriate partnership for this.
Doctoral:
I
am currently second-supervising two students. My preference would
be to develop a team supervision system - something that I hope
to do in due time.
Completions:
2010:
Kirandeep Chahal (second supervisor)
Research:
As
described above, I am committed to collaboration between universities
and between the academic sector, the NHS and industry. Since 2001,
my total income from grants and other sources is over £14.5M. The
main research themes are described below.
The
MATCH (Multidisciplinary Assessment of Technology Centre for Healthcare)
programme is researching value-based analysis of medical devices
from three perspectives - that of the user, the company that invents
and brings it to market, and the service providers or their proxies
that evaluate the technology for use by service providers. Among
other things, the programme is developing guides and tools to enable
inventors and small businesses to make very early predictions about
the costs and benefits of new technology. A key goal is to embed
these in a Bayesian framework that extends from first concept to
in-market surveillance. Our two major thrusts are to create funding
streams (by selling the research outputs and service based upon
them) to sustain the programme beyond the end of the grant, and
to push out internationally.
RIGHT
(Research into Global Healthcare Tools) developed a selection tool
to help those engaged in service development or delivery to select
appropriate simulation or modelling methods when making decisions.
We have also compared the use of simulation and modelling in healthcare
with the use of similar techniques in commerce and industry, military
and aerospace communities. Initial comparisons indicate that critical
benefits achieved by industry (cost reductions and speedier logistics)
and the military (training, development of doctrine and risk-reduction)
resonate with healthcare needs. At present, we are bidding for a
follow-on to the RIGHT 2-year feasibility study. My target is to
obtain £10-20M over 4-5 years, involving all the top simulation,
modelling and OR schools that have a significant healthcare presence
in the UK.
Between
them, MATCH (devices) and RIGHT (services) cover a significant piece
of the healthcare delivery space. Critically, the interface between
technology and services is becoming a very interesting policy field
just now.
Even
things I have tried that have not quite worked out have been interesting.
A 'paper-in-a-day' experiment to write papers by going away overnight
was not a great success in itself (although we have an interesting
draft on the concept of the customer in banking on the table) but
has provided an exemplar upon which I believe we can do some interesting
writing within MATCH and RIGHT.
My
patent portfolio is described under my industrial career.
Finally,
although I have not yet landed a major grant in information systems,
I have collaborated with a number of top class academics and have
published several articles on IS.
Vision:
The dysfunction between the world of technology and the world
of service provision is fascinating. This portfolio of research
aims to link qualitative evaluation to more quantitative methods
(for instance to articulate price premium that user-preferred design
features might attract) and to link both to persuasive business
models. The goal is better services using better designed and more
appropriate technology. The idea of groups of people working together
to achieve more than the sum of what they would achieve as individuals
is one I find highly attractive. So I hope to go after these goals
with teams that have fun.
Administration
2010
- present: Committee for Academic and Staff Promotions. I am just
going through my first cycle of this process, which provides a spectacular
view of the talent across campus.
2005-2009:
Research and Enterprise Committee (now the Research and Knowledge
Transfer Committee). Specific activity has included the following:
|
Working
on business models to support changes that would enable research
staff to migrate from fixed-term to permanent contracts. In
the end, this was successful, although the mechanism ultimately
imposed has proved highly bureaucratic.
|
|
Quality
assurance - one year I undertook a review of several of the
University's Research Centres. This exercise gave me a new appreciation
of some of the research being undertaken - especially in Music,
where Brunel has a strong position in contemporary composition.
|
2006-2007:
I spent about a year on the Costing and Pricing Sub-Committee -
the effects of the transparency exercise and FEC being the main
issues on the table at the time.
2004-2005:
When Brunel restructured itself in 2004/5 it set up eight working
groups to make proposals for combining departments into schools.
The aim was that chairs could be selected away from their disciplinary
fields and I chaired the working group that focused on a new Institute
for the Environment. This was an interesting and challenging task
because it represented a threat to both Biology and Geography on
campus, and the role involved a delicate line between staff and
management. Also, the various elements that were to be combined
into and Institute for the Environment represented very different
views and personalities. In the end, some of the scenario modelling
proved prescient.
The
experience convinced me that strategic business planning was still
in its infancy as far as academia was concerned at the time. However,
it gave me a good insight to much of the pedagogic bureaucracy.
Moreover, from what I now see, the planning process has become -
quite independently of me - very much better connected up.
2009-2010:
I proposed and found a facilitator for a workshop (overnight at
a local hotel) that brought staff from three Schools, a Pro Vice-Chancellor
and the Vice-Principal together to discuss the University's opportunities
in manufacturing (at its broadest) in the light of new initiatives
coming from Government and the Research Councils. This has received
good backing from the top and the first reports due out soon.
Vision:
Universities are wonderful places. I would like better to understand
how they work - through experience with the machinery of academe
- and to leverage that to the greater benefit of those outside,
and more fulfilment for those inside.
Grant
|
Amount
|
Date
|
As
principal Investigator
|
MATCH
1 GR/S29874/01
|
£3,616,134
|
June
2003 - 2008
|
MATCH
Management top-up (EP/C513045/1)
|
£57,953
|
Nov
2004 - 2007
|
RIGHT
EP/E019900/01
|
£1,135,688
|
Mar
2007 - 2009
|
MATCH
renewal EP/F063822/1
|
£6,941,929
|
Nov
2008 - 2013
|
MATCH-PLUS
EP/G012393/1
|
£1,764,282
|
Nov
2008 - 2013
|
Sub
total
|
£13,515,986
|
|
As
Co-Investigator
|
Leverhulme
Grant (Joint with Geoff Rodgers)
|
£44,764
|
October
2004
|
Exemplar
studies in assessing the value of innovative medical devices
for adoption within the NHS (EP/F037775/1), R27110 with the
University of Nottingham. (Total value £100,008)
|
£5,905
|
April
2008
|
South
Africa science networks (with Dr. Simon Taylor)
|
£5,500
|
April
2009 - June 2009
|
Sub
total
|
£56,169
|
|
Other
funding
|
Amount
|
Date
|
MATCH
1
|
|
|
MATCH
1 Industrial cash support
|
£617,000
|
To
October 2008
|
MATCH
1 PaSA support
|
£110,000
|
To
October 2008
|
MATCH
1 National Innovation Centre support
|
£110,000
|
To
October 2008
|
MATCH
1 NPSA support
|
£250,000
|
To
October 2008
|
Sub
total
|
1,087,000
|
|
MATCH
2 Industrial cash support
|
£44,100
|
To
January 2010
|
MATCH
2 PaSA support
|
£55,000
|
To
October 2009
|
MATCH
2 National Innovation Centre support
|
£55,000
|
To
October 2009
|
Sub
total
|
£154,100
|
|
Overall
Total
|
£14,813,255
|
|
Evidence of Esteem
Teaching:
Voted
Most Respected Lecturer by the students in their Yearbook, 2003
and 2005.
Voted
Most Interesting Lecturer/Staff Member in the Yearbook, 2008.
External examiner for Imperial College Business School (2006 -
2010).
Consultancy:
Over
the years, I have consulted for NICE, Manchester Strategic Health
Authority, the Modernization Agency, Matrix and CTMM (see Grant
& Research Review: my membership of their international review
is handled as consultancy).
Paper review:
I
review for a variety of Journals and conferences. Examples of
journals include JORS and BMJ and conferences including ICIS ('09)
and HICSS ('09 & '10).
I
am joint Guest Editor of a Special issue of Transactions on
Modeling and Computer Simulation on Healthcare simulation
and modelling, due out in 2011.
Grant & Research Review:
Again,
I have reviewed for EPSRC (and was a mentor at an EPSRC sandpit-type
Workshop in 2006), ESRC and Wellcome.
I
Peer Assist for the HaCIRIC Programme at Imperial (including International
Review, Dec 2008), sit on the steering committee of SLIM (Lean
Thinking in Hospitals) at Warwick, and am an advisor to the CHI+MED
programme at UCL.
I
am a member of the International Scientific Advisory Committee
for CTMM (Centre for Translational Molecular Medicine in the Netherlands).
Other:
I
sat on NICE's Evaluation Pathway for Medical Technologies (2009)
Working group 2: Selection and Routing Criteria to inform a rapid-access
process for device evaluation.
Invited talks:
In
the '80s and '90s I received many invitations to speak on my research
(see list of conference publications). The pattern is repeating
itself in my new research role. Specific recent invited events
include:
|
Sixth
MedTech Investing Europe Conference (Lausanne, February
14-15, 2008). Invited panellist
|
|
Second
International Health and Social Care Modelling 2008 (Portrush,
March 18-22, 2008). Plenary speaker.
|
|
NIHR
i4i Launch, Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre, London,
16 July 2008 (view presentation http://www.online-web-presentations.com//i4i-launch/S2.php
and clicking 'i4i working in partnership.')
|
|
MIT-Portugal
Workshop in the series: "Business-Government Interface for
Biomedical Technologies", Braga, 30 May, 2008). Speaker
|
|
Modelling
& Simulation for Emergency Management and Health Care Systems
(Boston, 24-25 July, 2008). Speaker
|
|
|
|
Keynote
Speaker, Medical Innovation Forum, Olympia, June 10th 2009.
|
|
Invited
speaker, Ambient Assisted Living Forum, Vienna, Sept 29-
Oct 1, 2009
|
|
Invited
Paper, WinterSim 2009, Austin Texas, December 2009.
|
|
Invited
Speaker, Almaden Institute, IBM Research, San Jose, April
28-29, 2010. (Watch
the video)
|
INDUSTRIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Healthcare in GEC and then
Marconi (1999 -2001)
I
worked with clinicians and healthcare specialists on novel systems
(e.g. an alternative to the NHS's National Programme for IT) and
Lean healthcare. This informed corporate healthcare strategy around
its imaging and communication strengths.
I
ran strategic planning seminars with company experts. One of the
most enjoyable involved exploring e-commerce options with a radiology
supply business in Cleveland, Ohio, over two days. I put together
an agenda that involved a mix of small group work, plenary reviews
and 'infosnacks' in which selected individuals researched a given
topic and reported back to the group in a 10-15 minute session.
The surprise for me was that although the corporate centre of the
company wanted to see radical new e-business models implemented,
the team felt that 'bricks' would win out over 'clicks' (i.e. a
physical presence with warehouses and dedicated logistics would
ultimately beat a web presence on its own). History has proved the
team right.
Strategic Research & Business
Development (1998-1999)
Having
moved out of line management, I realised that I needed to develop
a new set of skills for managing through influence. I bought a very
small amount of training (half a day from a mentor on a course I
had been on) and started to learn how to make small groups work.
I applied my growing competence in small-groups to technical and
business teams. An interesting example was to build a web site in
a day. In general, I was particularly keen to extract hard output,
such as reports or presentations, rather than to be left with flipcharts
and nice feelings at the end of a session. Data fusion was another
new experience, and supported strategic work on information architectures.
Through this work, I realised that I was drawn to big systems thinking.
Research Management at
the Marconi Research Centre (1996-1998)
I
ran a division of 24-30 people which tended to grow under my care,
and required a budget of £2½-3½M per annum. In GEC, one had to secure
much of the research funding from product units within the group,
European sources, or contracts with other companies. Technically,
I had responsibility for several small technology groups, covering
a range of areas: advanced printed circuit boards, electronic design,
wideband and multimedia, photonic systems and networks, plus miniature
displays. As well as learning about new technologies (flexible and
fineline printed circuit boards were new to me, as were the technologies
around miniature displays), I discovered the importance of financial
management and the way in which just one or two failing projects
could take up an inordinate amount of management time. Looking back,
I am most satisfied by the more practical projects - one went to
the bottom of the sea for an oil company and another was destined
for a camera system that was due to crash into an asteroid.
The most stretching element, however, was GEC's senior Personal
Development Programme, which introduced me to some very high calibre
managers and had a profound impact upon my own management style.
Involving 360 reviews and peer-to-peer analysis it was quite painful
at times, but provided a seminal and invaluable experience for me.
Business Development (1992
- 1995)
Alongside
some project and line management of groups, I was able to focus
on EMC (electromagnetic compatibility) and medical devices. As an
example, the latter involved identifying some technology within
the Research Centre that was useful in MR imaging. Training for
this role was provided at the GEC Management College at Dunchurch,
where I completed two week-long courses on marketing and business
development.
Early Management at the
Marconi Research Centre (1987 - 1994)
During
this time I got my first experience in teams and it also broadened
my technical background, introducing me to fabrication, polymers,
systems and applications, as well as the basics of day-to-day management
and staff development. The most challenging project was about 20
years ahead of its time - a collaboration with a US petro-chemical
company wanting to make plastic integrated optics. They would provide
the plastics, we would provide the design. It wasn't as simple as
that, but I learned a lot about fabrication and the need to stick
to a recipe. In the end, the partnership blew apart on commercial,
rather than technical grounds.
I took my first steps in business development with a European project
on fibre networks with the BBC. In retrospect, this was a seminal
experience, since there were three studio communities. Firstly,
there were the producers and actors who wanted to deliver an entertainment
product. Secondly, there was a technical community that understood
how to deliver the look and sound using the existing technology
(bundles of cables, electronics switches, etc). Finally, we were
trying to introduce a new technology which had to address the original
look and sound, but from a completely different base. To us, the
'technical experts' were actually a barrier to engaging with the
artistic staff. And cross-cultural barriers have been a recurring
theme for me ever since.
Finite Element Analysis
at MRC (1985 - c. 1988)
My
brief was to build an integrated optics simulation suite. I was
able to work with another team within the company and the resultant
system attracted invitations to speak around the world, including
my first and only trip to Japan. I sat on the usual national committees
and international conference groups. It was a fun time.
Patents
The
following have been filed, and a medical patent is going through,
now owned by Phillips.
UK Ref
|
Title
|
Topic
|
Status
|
Inventors
|
US ref
|
Title
|
GB 2189104 B
|
Improvements in
or relating to switching networks.
|
Design of optical
switch networks
|
732 Dec. '91 In
force?
|
Owen Young
|
Don't believe there
was a US filing
|
|
GB 2193337 B
|
Optical switch
apparatus
|
Delta-Kappa Switch
|
UK: PCNP
Mar. ' 94
US:FP
July ' 95 [1]
|
Young
|
US 5013114 A
|
Optical switch
apparatus
|
GB 2209844 B
|
Integrated Optic
Device
|
Outrigger waveguides
for bends
|
UK: PCNP
May '93
US:FP
May ' 94
|
Young
Croston
|
US 4906062 A
|
Integrated Optical
Waveguide Bend
|
GB 2215482 B
|
Optical in-line
filter
|
TMI with bulbous
mode mixer
|
UK: PCNP May '
93
US:FP
Nov. ' 98
|
Young
Radcliffe
Leac
|
US 4952018 A
|
Optical in line
filters
|
GB 2219871 B
|
Integrated Optic
Devices
|
Multimode bends
|
UK: PCNP
Apr. ' 94
US:FP
May ' 99
|
Young
|
US 4993794 A
|
Integrated optic
waveguide with bend
|
GB 2221768 B
|
Optical Devices
|
Waveguide transistors
|
UK: PCNP
Feb. ' 94
US:FP
Sept. ' 95
|
Young
|
US 5028108 A
|
Bipolar transistor
including optical waveguide
|
GB 2298931 B
|
Virtual force feedback
for synthetic environment
|
Medical patent
for minimally invasive surgery
|
732 in force?
Proceeding under section 32, Patents Act
|
Young
|
None, as far as
I know
|
|
None, as far as
I can see
|
|
Design improvement
for polymer waveguides
|
US: FP
Oct. '95
|
Young
Wisbey
Davies
|
US 5037168
|
Optical waveguides
|
[1] European patent
(EP 255 356 B1) Revoked ' 94
|
UNDERGRADUATE AND POSTGRADUATE
HIGHLIGHTS
As
an undergraduate, I built a 1-bit frame grabber to study laser speckle
using an old TV camera and a state-of-the-art microprocessor, which
I programmed in Z-80assembler. I built the circuitry, and the system
was used for laser speckle studies in the Final Year Physics Laboratory
for many years.
My
PhD research involved building a tuneable dye laser heterodyne spectrometer
to measure the hyperfine splitting of the 3P½ level of sodium to
±3kHz. This involved working with lasers and precision optics; designing
electronics for almost every decade between mains at 50Hz and microwave
circuits; and applying control theory. In addition, it brought me
experience with high vacuum systems, power systems and experimental
technique. I didn't publish anything until about 10 years later
(having learned to publish in industry) and discovered that the
measurements were still state of the art.
Personal Statement
In
terms of Belbin roles, I am a shaper and networker. I especially
enjoy working with high quality coordinators, plant and team-workers.
I believe in learning by doing and have learnt a lot in my time
as an academic.
I
read widely and enjoy writing - including some easy-read Christian
studies. The first (After the Fishermen) was an attempt to
link the leadership training I was experiencing in industrial management,
with the leadership I was part of in a local church, and the small-group
training Jesus used with his disciples. A second, Jake, was
a study on the Patriarch Jacob. The third, Going Global,
was also published by Paternoster in 2009.
I
spent much of 2009 reading around management theory, and was privileged
to be able to take in seminars by many of the leading thinkers in
the field (my gratitude to Sherlaws). I have just started to work
on writing easy-read management theory aimed at doctors, nurses,
and healthcare managers.
In
terms of voluntary activity, I am a governor at a local school,
Datchet St Mary's C of E Primary, where I chair the Finance Committee.
I also sit on the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead's Governors
Consultative Group. I am also active in my local church where I
sit on the Church Council and speak at services.
When
I have time, I enjoy poetry and painting - it used to be oils, but
I mess around with acrylics these days.
I
am married to Danielle and we have three sons.
Publications
|